• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Before Header

 郭汪律师事务所 KUEK, ONG & ASSOCIATES

  • Home
  • About
    • Our Achievement
      • Our Articles 中国报文章
        • Matrimonial & Family Matters 婚姻与家庭法
  • Law & Justice 法律与你同行
    • Our Youtube Video
  • Practice Areas 我们的专业
    • Corporate Law 企业法
    • Commercial Agreements (Drafting, Review and Legal Advisory) 商业合约
    • Litigation 民事诉讼​
    • Conveyancing & Loan 买卖产业与银行贷款
    • Will, Trust & Probate 遗嘱与遗产分配
  • Legal Articles 法律资讯
    • COVID 19 – 新冠肺炎事项
    • Agreements 合约
    • Bankruptcy 破产
    • Company Law 公司法
    • Criminal Offences 刑事案
      • Penal Code 刑事法典
      • Misc 其他刑事案
    • Family Law & Divorce 家庭法与离婚
      • Alimony 女方赡养费
      • Breach of Promise to Marriage 悔婚
      • Child 小孩
      • General Divorce 离婚事项
      • Matrimoial Assets 婚姻产业
    • Employment Law 劳工法
      • Dismissal 解雇
    • Partnership 合伙企业
    • Property Matters 产业事项
    • Tort 民事案
    • Will, Probate & LA 遗嘱与遗产分配
    • Misc 其他法律
    • New Article
    • Wilson Kuek的感想
  • Contact Us 联系我们
  • Subscribe Us

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • About
    • Our Achievement
      • Our Articles 中国报文章
        • Matrimonial & Family Matters 婚姻与家庭法
  • Law & Justice 法律与你同行
    • Our Youtube Video
  • Practice Areas 我们的专业
    • Corporate Law 企业法
    • Commercial Agreements (Drafting, Review and Legal Advisory) 商业合约
    • Litigation 民事诉讼​
    • Conveyancing & Loan 买卖产业与银行贷款
    • Will, Trust & Probate 遗嘱与遗产分配
  • Legal Articles 法律资讯
    • COVID 19 – 新冠肺炎事项
    • Agreements 合约
    • Bankruptcy 破产
    • Company Law 公司法
    • Criminal Offences 刑事案
      • Penal Code 刑事法典
      • Misc 其他刑事案
    • Family Law & Divorce 家庭法与离婚
      • Alimony 女方赡养费
      • Breach of Promise to Marriage 悔婚
      • Child 小孩
      • General Divorce 离婚事项
      • Matrimoial Assets 婚姻产业
    • Employment Law 劳工法
      • Dismissal 解雇
    • Partnership 合伙企业
    • Property Matters 产业事项
    • Tort 民事案
    • Will, Probate & LA 遗嘱与遗产分配
    • Misc 其他法律
    • New Article
    • Wilson Kuek的感想
  • Contact Us 联系我们
  • Subscribe Us

员工犯错,雇主要负责赔偿?-案例篇

Vicarious Liability of Employer on Employee’s Wrongful Act

  • In Dyre and Wife v Munday @ anor [1895] 2 QB 742, CA Lord Esher MR ruled:

“The liability of the master does not rest merely on the question of authority, because the authority given is generally to do the master’s business rightly; but the law says that if, in the course of carrying out his employment, the servant commits an excess beyond the scope of his authority, the master is liable.“ 当员工执行雇主委托的任务时,员工做了超出他权限应该做的事,雇主是要负责的。

  • In Goh Choon Seng v Lee Kim Soo [1925] AC 550, apart from holding the same view as above, held that where a servant did some work for which he was appointed to do, but did in a manner not authorized, and would not have authorized had he known it, the master was nevertheless liable.
  • In Keppel Bus Co. Ltd v Sa’ad bin Ahmad [1972] 2 MLJ 121, the Court of Appeal of Singapore found that there was sufficient evidence to conclude that the conductor in hitting the respondent in a very high handed manner, was acting in the course of employment.
  • In Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 ALL E.R 97 Lord Denning: “In considering whether a prohibited act was within the course of employment, it depends very much on the purpose for which it was done. If it is done for his employer’s business it is usually done in the course of his employment, even though it is a prohibited act….”
  • In Roshairee bin Abd Wahab v Mejar Mustafa bin Omar & 2 Ors [1997] 2 AMR 2044

”The plaintiff was assaulted by the first and second defendants while undergoing an orientation programme at a military camp in Sabah. At the material time, the plaintiff was under the charge of the first defendant, who was assigned as a duty officer to carry out the orientation programme. The second defendant was attached to the said regiment stationed in the said camp.

Although the first defendant’s acts of assault were unauthorized by the third defendant, they were carried out during the normal course of duty of the first defendant. Such being the case, his unauthorized acts have become so connected with his authorized acts that this court finds them to have become “modes-although improper modes of doing them.” For this, the third defendant (the Government of Malaysia–supplied) must be held vicariously liable for the unlawful actions of this defendant.”

请参阅: 属下非法拍照,雇主要负责?

==============================

*如果需要法律咨询或者聘请律师处理法律事务,你可以联系我们。

*浏览我们律师楼的法律文章: www.kuekong.com

*订阅我们的YouTube: http://bit.ly/lawnjustice

*加入 我们的“法律与你同行”FB 群组: http://bit.ly/fblawnjustice

*Like 我们的“法律与你同行” FB Page: http://bit.ly/lawnjusticefbpage

*加入我们的网络论坛: www.queco.org

*Kuek, Ong & Associates. Advocates & Solicitors. No.86-1, Jalan Mahagoni 1, Bandar Botanic, 41200 Klang, Selangor Darul Ehsan. Klang Lawyer. 巴生(吧生)律师楼。

*我们的律师楼拥有超过15年的执业经验。我们处理民事纠纷,商业纠纷,追讨债务,遗产分配,遗嘱,离婚案,抚养权,领养小孩,拟商业合约,拟买卖合约,银行贷款,法律咨询,法律顾问,等法律事务。全马的案件,我们皆都处理。

*Wilson Kuek是“法律与你同行 Law & Justice”面子书群组的创办人。“法律与你同行”是马来西亚最大的法律平台。我们为无数的平民百姓免费解除了各类的法律困扰。

#Vicarious Liability of Employer on Employee’s Wrongful Act

You May Also Be Interested In:

员工犯错,雇主没有立刻采取纪律行动

项目被发展商搁置,买家可取消买卖合约吗?

员工投诉被逼迫签署自愿离职的文件

联邦法庭裁决迟交屋赔偿金从付订金算起-19-01-2021

接种冠状病毒病疫苗的国民可出国

租约: Tenancy at Will [2011] MLJU 111

首相宣布援助配套(PERMAI)- 18-01-2021

1月1日起强制外劳拭子检测(21-12-2020)

租约: Tenancy at Will [2004] 7 MLJ 471

Previous Post: « 属下非法拍照,雇主要负责?
Next Post: 法定假日 Public Holidays »

Primary Sidebar

我们拥有超过15年的执业经验,擅长和有效率处理离婚案,领养手续,遗嘱,遗产分配 ,商业官司,商业合约,买卖合约,银行贷款。全马案件皆有处理。”法律与你同行”,最大法律平台的创办人。 We have more than 15 years of experience in the legal profession. We handle matters such as commercial disputes, civil litigation, debt recovery, probate & letter of administration, will, divorce, children custody, maintenance/alimony, adoption, distribution of matrimonial assets, drafting commercial agreement, drafting sale and purchase agreement, process loan documentations, legal consultation, legal advisory, miscellaneous legal works
  • Practice Areas

Copyright © 2021 郭汪律师事务所 KUEK, ONG & ASSOCIATES · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Mai Theme